This can be designed to be the "go to" powder-or darn near it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It can be the inspiration for lots of pet loads, nonetheless I haven't been pleased with the final results.
I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was acquiring far more strain and was slower in comparison to the outdated stuff. I don't keep in mind if I even tried out common h4831 or not; I am contemplating not. Click on to broaden...
You are right they are the identical the SC is short Minimize so it meters superior, I do not Imagine you can get just common 4831 anymore
243, and some of the loads I have begun with encompass, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am going to shoot the IMR7828 loads initially, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises once the H-4831sc loads clearly show a shotgun pattern! Who appreciates, I just may well look for a use for it In any case.
INgunner54 said: It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Found a node and shot some groups.
I've made use of H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without having variation. The one thing could be the short Reduce provides you with somewhat more Room. Very good luck!gun)
If there is not any load data it is for the reason that this powder will not be appropriate for this cartridge. Generally a person will not likely locate one particular powder to fit h4831sc all cartridges, plus the loved ones of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) you are inquiring about isn't going to function.
If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you could look for a load that works Okay With all the 4831. The h4831 vs h4831sc bullets I attempted that were in excess of 70 grains would not stabilize in my rifle, which had the common fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the largest bullet that may stabilize, nevertheless it did that beautifully. It's a humorous-looking bullet by using a rounded nose profile, but it really shoots fantastic and kills very well. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down instantly with rib-cage hits.
It's possible you'll possibly: one) Proceed and have the firearm(s) listed under instantly removed from your shopping cart:
In addition, it goes on to claim that due to fshorter grains, that load density might be somewhat higher.
This really is an older thread, you may not get a reaction, and could be reviving an old thread. You should take into account developing a new thread.
Like everyone explained, the SC means “brief Minimize” and is particularly a little bit simpler to meter. Will make you concern why they might nonetheless make the standard just one.
rayporter claimed: i under no circumstances recognized a variance besides the regular is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Click to broaden...
Of course, sitting about for h4831sc load data 20+ several years (I'm sure a man who is still using the H4831 he bought within the 60s), implies that burn up costs will most likely transform a smidge, and new manufacture things will probably be a little bit distinctive too.
Comments on “The Ultimate Guide To h4831 vs h4831sc”